The Man Who Made Elvis King
By John Anderson
STAFF WRITER
July 13, 2003THE COLONEL: The
Extraordinary Story of Colonel Tom Parker and
Elvis Presley, by Alanna Nash. Simon & Schuster,
394 pp., $25.
Guilty of every deadly sin except perhaps sloth
and lust, the Colonel Tom Parker of Alanna Nash's
"The Colonel" is a figure not just of cupidity,
dishonesty and ruthlessness but unspeakable
grubbiness and bad taste. Just reading about him
makes you want to take a shower; having written
nearly 400 pages about him, Nash probably wanted
to have her soul sent out and dry-cleaned.
And yet, it's a fascinating
book, the proverbial car crash with a dust jacket.
Born Andre van Kuijk in Breda, Holland, and made a
"colonel" by another snake charmer, Louisiana Gov.
Jimmie Davis, Parker has long been the Iago, Judas
and Caliban of rock and roll. Presley may or may
not have been an "idiot savant," as he was dubbed
by songwriting legends Jerry Lieber and Mike
Stoller. But he was a country boy whose father,
Vernon, had done prison time, whose adored mother,
Gladys, had, as a result, taught him both to fear
authority and promise to get the family out of
debt. Parker, a carny by both background and
nature - a chiseler who makes Reagan-era junk-bond
salesmen look like Boy Scouts - knew how to work a
con and certainly knew how to work Elvis. It's
been suggested that Parker took half of everything
Presley made over the course of his two-decade
career. Nash implies that this would be an
understatement.
As the title makes plain, this
book by Nash (who has also authored biographies of
Dolly Parton, Jessica Savitch and Presley himself)
is in no way an Elvis story, although Elvis, as
Parker's only client (after stints managing
singers Gene Austin and Eddy Arnold), is the
solitary planet upon which Parker's cancerous moon
throws its malignant shadow. There were always
questions about their relationship as client and
manager. Why was Elvis allowed to make such
astoundingly bad movies, one after the other? Why
did he go into the Army at the height of his
popularity (he could easily have gotten out of
it)? Why didn't Parker allow Presley to tour
Europe? And why, despite a pathological need to
swindle ("He treated everything like a carnival,"
a colleague told Nash) did Parker allow Elvis to
become "the largest single taxpayer on a straight
income in the country"? No tax shelters. Not even
a hint of fiduciary impropriety. Because Parker
was terrified of the IRS and of the government in
general. Why? Nash concedes that much of what
she's unearthed is speculation. But even as
circumstantial evidence, it's pretty convincing.
Parker's entire life was a
collection of chicaneries, evasions and forged
information - he would even, apparently, take
credit for inventing a hideous carnival scam like
the "Dancing Chickens" (live poultry placed on a
red-hot surface, which thus "danced") just to
pilfer an anecdote ("If I can steal it and get by
with it, it's mine," he once said.) While Parker's
Dutch roots were no secret, why he left Breda -
cutting off his entire family and all but denying
their existence - is another story. Why did he
leave so abruptly and without looking back? Nash
says it may have been murder.
On May 17, 1929, a newlywed
named Anna van den Enden had her brains bashed in
at her husband's Breda greengrocery, an act of
such viciousness it was assumed to be a crime of
passion. Parker's - or van Kuijk's - disappearance
occurred simultaneously. Parker was never known
for physical violence, although his temper was
legendary. But if Anna van den Enden's blood was
on his hands, it certainly would explain why he
never left the United States after reaching its
shores, why he never took advantage of the Alien
Registration Act of 1940 (which would have allowed
him to stay regardless of his undocumented past)
and why, given Parker's piratical soul, he never
wanted to become naturalized: Had he violated U.S.
law, his unnaturalized status might have proved a
tactical advantage.
Why do we care about Colonel
Tom Parker, possible killer and unquestioned con
man? Nash gives us two reasons: He was the man who
"almost single-handedly took the carnival
tradition first to rock and roll and then to
modern mass entertainment, creating the blueprint
for the powerful style of management and
merchandising that the music business operates by
today. By merely applying the exploitationalist
tactics of the barker to his own client, he drew a
straight line from the bally platform of the old-
time carnival to the hullabalooed concert stage."
The other reason, of course, is
Elvis Presley. The story of American popular music
has been a long, sad tradition of white ripping
off black: Presley was as guilty of this as any
other white exploiter - even if, in his apparent
simplicity, he was just following his musical
heart. He took African-American musical trends and
made them palatable to a white audience. The
near-mythic twist in Presley's fate is that he
wound up sharing with his black influences the
soul-killing assassination of his talent, which
ended with his slowly, methodically killing
himself. Presley may have had more money, more
prestige, drugs that were legal and a publicity
machine that kept most of his
sexual-pharmaceutical antics out of the limelight.
Ultimately, though, Presley's artistic potential
was stymied by a man who was interested only in
protecting and enriching himself and who, unlike
Frankenstein, outlived his own monster.
Copyright © 2003, Newsday, Inc. |